TBO.com, The Tampa Tribune and The Tampa Times - breaking news and weather
Friday, Aug 01, 2014

The Right Stuff

A politics blog by Tom Jackson

Tom Jackson's baseball card - if he had one - would report he throws left, writes right. In his columns and blog, "The Right Stuff," southpaw Jackson provides insight into the evolving human condition from a distinctly conservative point of view.

Changeling Charlie’s vow to go Total Obama

Published:
By Tom Jackson

Now that everyone’s favorite Republican-turned-independent-turned-Democrat has announced he is prepared to go Total Obama from Day 1 if he’s restored to the governor’s mansion, voters can’t be blamed for wondering whether Charlie Crist really wants the job. Maybe he’s already moved on to the Next Big Thing.

After all, the most recent polls indicate thorough dissatisfaction with President Obama. Not only is he upside-down on virtually every measurable facet of his job performance, CNN recently and famously found if we took an election mulligan, the golfer-in-chief would lose to Republican Mitt Romney in a landslide.

Nonetheless, here comes Crist, within shouting distance of primary election day and miles ahead in the polls, clawing his way to the left of Nan Rich, his virtually unknown Democrat rival from Weston, and hoping to get there by imitating Obama’s notorious pen-and-phone gambit.

Click to continue reading this post

Big gap in left’s Obamacare subsidy argument

Published:
By Tom Jackson

Having dwelled so long in their self-affirming echo chamber, lefty journalists appear incapable of honestly acknowledging the hole in their argument about Obamacare’s inviolability. Too bad for them about the decision that came down from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals last week; their denial makes a thin reed against which to lean.

To recap: In a 2-1 decision, the United States’ second-highest court ruled that the plain language of the Affordable Care Act means what it says, and what it says is only applicants for medical insurance through state plans are eligible for tax subsidies, and that the Internal Revenue Service — doing the bidding of the departments of Treasury and Health and Human Services — acted illegally when it issued a regulation that those who applied through federally operated exchanges also qualified for subsidies.

The left says the idea that only state-run exchanges earned subsidies for its clients is nuts, that Congress — and by Congress we mean historically lopsided majorities of Democrats, who alone coerced Obamacare across the line in a Yuletide 2010 frenzy of legislative bribery — obviously meant anyone who got insurance through any sort of exchange would also get a subsidy because otherwise, well, the plan would collapse.

Click to continue reading this post

How can Crist’s ‘fairness’ epiphany be limited to couples?

Published:
By Tom Jackson

Now that Charlie Crist has famously, publicly and, not to put too fine a point on it, sanctimoniously renounced yet another position he until recently held passionately, three questions are appropriate.

One expects the second two never will be posed.

The topic is same-sex marriage, the recent rulings in Key West and Miami that the state’s ban offends Mr. Madison’s document, and Changeling Charlie’s endorsement of those decisions.

Click to continue reading this post

Obamacare’s flesh wound

Published:
By Tom Jackson

That shiver of excitement shared by Obamacare opponents Tuesday shouldn’t be mistaken for ultimate triumph. Yes, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the second highest court in the land, dealt a blow to Obamacare when it ruled in favor of the law as it is written and against after-the-fact regulatory whim.

At issue is whether Obamacare applicants through federal exchanges qualify for tax subsidies. The law as written lays out plainly that only those who apply through state exchanges are eligible. Just this moment, however, 36 states have not set up their own exchanges, affecting about 4.7 million subscribers. No matter, said the IRS, which unilaterally rewrote the law to include federal exchange applicants, too.

Not so fast, said the D.C. Court. Conceding that there would be disruption caused by their ruling, Judge Thomas Griffith — a George W. Bush appointee known as a moderate — wrote this for the majority:

Click to continue reading this post

Extrapolating the Jolly standard

Published:
By Tom Jackson

Whether David Jolly’s epiphany is one of conviction or simply a matter of having deciphered the political tea leaves is an open question, but either way, on the matter of same-gender marriage, the freshman Republican congressman from Pinellas County has crossed the bridge of no return. In an email reply to a question from the Washington Post, Jolly had this to say on the matter:

“As a matter of my Christian faith, I believe in traditional marriage,” said Jolly. “But as a matter of constitutional principle I believe in a form of limited government that protects personal liberty. To me, that means that the sanctity of one’s marriage should be defined by their faith and by their church, not by their state. Accordingly, I believe it is fully appropriate for a state to recognize both traditional marriage as well as same-sex marriage, and therefore I support the recent decision by a Monroe County Circuit Judge” in which Florida’s ban was ruled unconstitutional.

Thus did Jolly put his name to an exquisite threading-of-the-needle. His faith preference is for one arrangement, but his political philosophy compels him to acknowledge the reasonableness of the other. What his of-the-moment statement does not do, however, is anticipate what must, inevitably, come next. Indeed, he invites it.

Click to continue reading this post

Warren’s fantasyland: A ramification-free world

Published:
By Tom Jackson

Elizabeth Warren — she of the imagined American Indian heritage that launched a thousand puns — addressed her real tribe the other day, laying out a warpath agenda for delegates to the far-left Netroots Nation conference.

The venue could not have been more ideal: A stage in a dying city — Detroit — that is the poster child for unrestricted liberal impulses. Not that anyone with a Netroots Nation credential would have noticed, or admitted as much. In their world, when liberalism fails, it’s because it wasn’t tried hard enough, or long enough, or it was sabotaged by insidious right-wing forces.

Such purity of faith helps explain why the delegates whooped as Warren described her us-vs.-sinister-them platform for 2014 and beyond. Why, John Nichols, columnist for The Nation, was practically rhapsodic.

Click to continue reading this post

Another lost-hard-drive improbability

Published:
By Tom Jackson

From the “You-Can’t-Make-This-Stuff-Up” file comes news confirming your suspicion that no matter how corrupt you thought the current administration is, it’s worse.

It seems a Federal Elections Commission lawyer, known to her coworkers as “Obama Girl,” breezily violated the Hatch Act — a prohibition against federal employees advocating for campaigns during work hours — during the run-up to the 2012 election. It also seems, despite her admission, she won’t/can’t be prosecuted, because her office hard drive was recycled by efficient agency IT professionals.

According to London’s MailOnline:

Click to continue reading this post

The eye of our latest ‘man-caused disaster’

Published:
By Tom Jackson

Remember, way back a week or so, when Texas Gov. Rick Perry invited President Obama down to the centers near the Rio Grande where the surge of illegal immigrant children find accommodation? Remember, though it was so long ago, how Perry urged Obama to visit and, surrounded by the sad truth of the crisis and national TV cameras, announce to restive Central Americans that their plans to circumvent U.S. immigration laws would not be tolerated?

And remember how Obama chose instead to flee to a Denver pub, where he spent the evening — sleeves expertly rolled up and tie dangling, but still firmly knotted — shooting pool, quaffing beer and declining the offer of a perfectly legal marijuana joint? Because, as he said reassuringly to the American people alarmed about their increasingly irrelevant borders, “this isn’t theater” and he wasn’t “interested in photo ops.”

Well. Didn’t that make you feel better, more confident that the commander-in-chief had a plan to make things all right?

Click to continue reading this post

Bibi gets off Sunday’s best line

Published:
By Tom Jackson

Interviewed by Brit Hume on Fox News Sunday, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu distilled the essence of his nation’s current conflict with Hamas forces in Gaza — in which Israel explodes incoming missiles with its “Iron Dome” defense and Hamas stores rockets in mosques and sites launchers near schools — in a quip:

“Here’s the difference between us. We’re using missile defense to protect our civilians, and they’re using their civilians to protect their missiles.”

Done and dusted.

Click to continue reading this post

A cynical assault on the First Amendment

Published:
By Tom Jackson

There is enormous mischief in the proposed constitutional amendment voted out (10-8, along party lines) by the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday. Enormous and purposeful.

Drafted, ostensibly, to deal with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Citizens United case, the amendment would grant Congress unprecedented and ultimate authority over the First Amendment. No, silly. Nekkid dancing, flag burning and street-corner begging would remain protected forms of expression.

If, on the other hand, you and your neighbors decided you weren’t happy with your congressman, so you pooled your money to support a rival, you would most likely come to the attention of whatever agency sprung from the absolute horror proposed by Sen. Tom Udall, a New Mexico Democrat.

Click to continue reading this post