TBO.com, The Tampa Tribune and The Tampa Times - breaking news and weather
Thursday, Jul 31, 2014
Commentary

Common-sense justice

Published:

WASHINGTON A healthy criminal justice system — one that is simultaneously effective and fair — demands neither too much discretion nor too little. Monday’s welcome news about stop-and-frisk searches and mandatory minimum drug sentences illuminates both aspects of that moral imperative.

On the unbridled-discretion end of the spectrum, U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled that New York City’s aggressive stop-and-frisk program violated the constitutional prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure as well as its guarantee of equal protection.

To read Scheindlin’s opinion is to feel sympathy both for the innocent targets of the unconstitutional stops and the police instructed to carry them out.

Kevin Almonor, a Manhattan high school student, was stopped when he was walking down a Harlem street at 10 p.m. on a Saturday night, pushed onto the hood of a police car, handcuffed and taken to the precinct.

“What are you doing?” Almonor asked the officers as he was being frisked. “I’m going home. I’m a kid.”

But sympathy for the cops, who in Scheindlin’s recounting are often overeager to make stops and abusive in conducting them?

Yes, because they are both pressured from above to make stops, lots of them, and burdened with too much discretion in deciding whom to stop.

When officers bothered to fill out forms justifying stops, they checked off boxes with loose justifications such as “furtive movements” or “suspicious bulge/object.” People were questioned simply because of the suspicious fact of meeting a generalized description — young black male, 18 to 24 — in a high-crime area.

But Scheindlin did not order an end to stop-and-frisk. She ordered that it be conducted more carefully, with more training before the fact and more supervision afterward.

Attorney General Eric Holder’s announcement on mandatory-minimum sentences dealt with the opposite problem: inadequate discretion when it comes to sentencing, once again an issue with racial overtones.

Holder described a nation “coldly efficient in our incarceration efforts,” with a prison population that has grown by almost 800 percent since 1980 and almost half of the inmates serving time for drug-related crimes.

Holder said he was instructing federal prosecutors to stop using mandatory minimum laws against “low-level, nonviolent drug offenders who have no ties to large-scale organizations, gangs or cartels.”

This is a useful step; an even better approach would be to restore more flexibility to judges. In the Senate, two bipartisan odd couples — Illinois Democrat Dick Durbin and Utah Republican Mike Lee, and Vermont Democrat Patrick Leahy and Kentucky Republican Rand Paul — have introduced measures to give judges more power to override mandatory minimums.

Leahy and Paul describe their broader measure as a “safety valve” in the current, rigid system, and that is a useful metaphor. Because true justice encompasses both rules and discretion; it provides certainty and safety valve.

Ruth Marcus’ email address is ruth marcus@washpost.com.

Comments